Ayodhya Ram Mandir

Ram Mandir, Ayodyha

Hindu devotees throughout the world rejoiced at the consecration of the Ram Mandir (Temple) in Ayodhya on January 22nd, 2024.  The event was broadcast at over 300 locations in the US, and live streamed in dozens of countries. From Newsweek: New York’s Times Square Witnesses Hindu Joy Over Ayodhya Temple, Published Jan 22, 2024 at 1:44 PM EST, By Danish Manzoor (italics added):

 “The temple, linked to the Hindu deity Lord Rama, is believed to have been originally destroyed by Emperor Babur by building the—now razed—Babri Mosque. The Temple-Mosque dispute has become a historical and religious flashpoint. Hindu devotees feel that its restoration and the reinstatement of Hindu Lord Rama’s idol symbolize a momentous occasion for them. ‘It’s simple, really. The holy land where our Ram Temple originally stood has been reclaimed after centuries and following due process of the law,’ said Ajay Patel, coordinator of Overseas Friends of Ram Mandir, New York.” 

As explained in Wikipedia: “The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. The Supreme Court ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by the government of India) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Rama) temple. The court also ordered the government to give an alternative 5 acres of land in another place to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board for the purpose of building a mosque as a replacement for the demolished Babri Masjid.”  

‘It is crucial for communal harmony that we finally put this matter to rest. The sentiments attached to Ayodhya are deeply emotional, and considering that Indian Muslims constitute the second-largest majority, expressing solidarity and celebrating together could contribute significantly to bridging the trust gap that has developed over the years’  Sana Hashmi, fellow at Taiwan Asia Exchange Foundation, told Newsweek.

NY Times, Times Square 1.22.24

 And yet, a great deal of consternation has been expressed in some quarters about Indian Prime Minister Najendra Modi’s decision not only to attend the Ram Mandir Pran Prastishtha [1] on January 22nd, but his leading role in the ceremony itself and his speech afterward. How, it is asked, in a purportedly secular, democratic nation, can one justify Modi’s whole-hearted promotion of what is viewed by many as a non-secular, polarizing activity?  Pakistan claims it is an attempt to marginalize the Muslim community.  A fatwa was allegedly issued against All India Imam Organization chief Dr Imam Umer Ahmed Ilyasi after he attended the Pran Pratishtha ceremony.  And many people view the occasion as evidence of India’s continued, precipitous slide away from Democracy and into right-wing nationalism.

 Prime Minister Modi expressed the deep joy and reverence Hindus experience during this pivotal civilizational moment. Some excerpts of Modi’s speech as shared by Sharangee Dutta in an India Today article, 1.22.24: 

” . . . Lord Ram is the ‘spirit of (the) Indian Constitution’. . . “

The Temple symbolizes the “national consciousness” in the form of Lord Ram.

“Ram is the faith of India, Ram is the foundation of India. Ram is the idea of India, Ram is the law of India… Ram is the prestige of India, Ram is the glory of India…Ram is the leader and Ram is the policy. Ram is eternal…When Ram is honoured, its effect does not last for years or centuries, its effect is for thousands of years,” PM Modi said.

Absent either an identification with the Hindutva movement or a knowledge of the New Way and India’s role as embodying the soul of our Earth [2], it is easy to understand the consternation.  However, we must look deeper.  

Further on in this blog are links to articles Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet [Thea] wrote regarding the import of Ram’s 1949 re-appearance in Ayodhya.  To ‘set the stage’ for that occurence and the developments since, we begin with a 2001 article Thea wrote, entitled ‘Burden of Destiny’, for a  Hyderabad based journal, on the 75th anniversary of the RSS – Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). (https://aeongroup.com/aeon-group-the-burden-of-a-destiny).  The RSS is an organization  which helped the BJP, PM Modi’s party, come to power.  The RSS and the BJP share the goal of India fulfilling Her role as a Hindu Nation, which is often wrongly construed as merely constituting right-wing nationalism.

The article, having been written in 2001, was well before the election of Narendra Modi (2014).   Thea Sees that the RSS will continue to play a significant role in moving India into what she calls the ‘inalterable Pulse of Destiny’.  Thea begins with Sri Aurobindo writing about his vision of India’s future and destiny.  She alludes to the cosmological support of this destiny, about which she has extensively written (see footnote 2), tying it in with the founding of the RSS. 

We include here some relevant excerpts of the article and recommend reading it in its entirety (italics and bold added):

” I have written extensively on this hidden aspect of India’s destiny – i.e., the precise formula whereby a new mechanism is seen to have been operating, albeit in camouflaged form, since 1875. But it has to be borne in mind that when a process is hidden, or is really one thing while pretending in this external, material dimension to be another, there is attendant damage, destruction, and at certain points chaos to be expected. Given the fact that the divine Shakti has to work through inappropriate forms, there must inevitably be an accompanying loss of power. The concentration of energy required to carry the movement forward is significantly reduced. This introduces gaps, as it were, where energy is siphoned off; the result is a diminishing, or destruction of some sort because the true form, consisting of a certain shape to contain a determined energy balance, is not encountered on the material plane where destiny is played out. An example would be the form of the nation itself. In its higher destiny it has a certain shape, but on the ground that shape has been carved into and sections of the body of Bharat Mata have been cut out. The result is that in its spatial dimensions there is an inappropriate vessel and energy seeps out through these ‘gaps’.

In spite of this insufficiency the initial work has been done and in a certain sense successfully completed. Various aforementioned ‘contingency plans’ have been set in motion at appropriate times to counterbalance the loss due to this inadequate political, social and even physical form.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is one such ‘plan’. Therefore, it is quite reasonable to observe that the organisation often appears to be at odds with the political establishment, and even its own offspring, the present government, since its role has been to serve as a means of keeping the nation on a certain track that is in harmony with its pulse of destiny. This pulse is only one, not many. And in this we note another difficulty.

When we repeat the refrain, Unity in Diversity, we must understand what unity means for this ancient land. We know what its diversity is, but few are aware of the true nature of unity for this ancient civilisation. It has to do with the fact that of all the nations on Earth only India can lay claim to an unbroken civilisational line from the very distant past to the present. This is part and parcel of the role India is to play in the contemporary global context . . .

“This being the case, the original pulse of destiny is still sounding in the civilisation’s inner dimensions of being and it can still be ‘heard’. All Indians, and I repeat all, can hear that pulse and learn that they are in tune with it and that it resonates in the hearts of all inhabitants of this land. It is the upholding foundation of the contemporary nation, just as it was in ancient times. This is the energy field that permeates the consciousness of Bharat Mata. To deny its existence, or to claim that this underlying, upholding field of a given pulsation is non-existent, or else that it has been altered or modified over the ages, is to demonstrate ignorance of the workings of the Time-Spirit. For had that ‘thread’ from the ancient past been broken somewhere along the line of Time, we could then agree that ‘something else’ had taken the place of the original Pulse. This not having been the case, wisdom demands that we must accept this true position and work with it and not against it, for to do so is simply to prolong the present confusion and to foster a society that is at odds with its truth of being. When such is the case, all citizens abiding within the consciousness of Bharat Mata, of whatever creed, caste and class must necessarily suffer.

Thus, when the present Sarsangchalak [head of the RSS, JS] encourages all Indians to ‘join the mainstream’, he is in fact putting forth the same call: To find a harmony with this underlying and inalterable Pulse of Destiny that still today constitutes the nation’s upholding energy base.
I have demonstrated this cosmologically in all my written works. The point to be stressed is that cosmology is non-denominational, non-sectarian, and certainly not communal. The problem is that a new way is required, a new formulation that, while not denying the old, draws this discourse beyond the confines of these delimiting factors. When a new Age dawns, as Sri Aurobindo announced and cosmology confirms, it means that we have entered a transitional period and a new language must evolve to express more adequately the contemporary condition and demands. We know that the Vedic and Puranic Gods and Goddesses are expressions of cosmic energies. We must also realise that the cosmos is impersonal. Everything we know, every crystallisation of form is that same Energy, however we wish to label it. Indeed, ‘Truth (that Energy) is one, the wise know it by many names.’ Therefore, the new cosmology is simply a tool for drawing aside the veils covering that truth and rediscovering the original Pulse of the civilisation as the unifying factor of a common destiny.
It is perfectly proper for the Sarsangchalak to exhort all his fellow countrymen and women to accept this common heritage, not necessarily as Ram or Krishna and all the other cosmic Energies, but as an inherited Pulse of Destiny which, in an unbroken line of Time, unlike in any other civilisation, continues to uphold and to influence from its field of unity the contemporary diversity that forms this 21st century nation. We may ignore this fact; we may deny it; we may even make war against it. But none of this changes the reality that is Bharat and will ever remain Bharat for all its inhabitants.

Until 1989, the present Indian political structure was the channel for a meticulous and mathematical expression of that sacred Pulsation. Since then however, since the axis of the new India was forged and securely set in place, a period of turmoil seems to have ensued. It has continued until today and is likely to continue into the future. Unless, of course, other ‘forms’ come into being and the Time-Spirit is provided an adequate vessel for expressing that true Pulsation. The ostensible reason for this turmoil has been the collapse of single party rule. Coalition politics, after an initial upheaval attendant upon that collapse, seems now relatively stable. But this is simply a transitional period. Underlying the present calm is a power working to create new vessels, a new form of democratic process that will better express the nation’s unity in diversity. This is one of the sacred duties of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and kindred organisations.”

Students of Thea know she was extremely pleased at Modi’s election in 2014.  She clearly saw him as being an ‘adequate vessel’ for expressing the true Pulsation.

As indicated above, Thea also wrote specifically about Ram’s 1949 re-appearance  in Ayodhya and its significance, occuring as it did precisely on the entry to Makar Sankranti (Capricorn, Winter Solstice).  Below are links to the series of articles she wrote on the subject, which appear on the Puranic Cosmology Updated blogpost and in the Vishaal Newsletter.  As for the timing of the Pran Prastishtha itself, [3] I am not in a position to comment, other than to say from what I have read it appears to have been decided based on the position of Brihaspati, or Jupiter, planet of benevolence and auspiciousness, in relation to the Sidereal zodiac (calculations based upon Earth’s shifting relationship to the constellational sphere) rather than the Tropical zodiac which is based on the constant relationship between Earth and her Sun.  Thea has written a great deal on the subject of India’s ‘lost measure’, which began as India abandoned use of the Tropical Zodiac in favor of the sidereal/constellational sphere.  [4]. The outcome of the sidereal approach is that  Indian astrological calculations are 23 days ‘off’.    Importantly, the celebration of Makar Sankranti, which is the gateway to Capricorn and begins on the Winter Solstice, is now observed mid-January in India, well after the actual Solstice.  If, indeed, the calculation of the most auspicious time for the Pran Prastishtha was based on Earth’s relationship to that shifting constellational sphere, it is also ‘off’, as Jupiter would not have been in the auspicious position it was deemed to be in.  Interestingly, Pluto moved into Aquarius on January 20/21, conjunct the Sun (using the Tropical zodiac). This is considered to be a very powerful, transformative aspect indicating a shift in our evolutionary journey.  I was informed by an acquaintance who is an astrologer that Indian astrologers don’t generally work with Pluto or the other outer planets.  If they had, they would have considered Pluto to be in Capricorn and conjunct the Sun on that date, which has a different significance entirely.  

 

‘Culture & Cosmos – 2, Part 3.4’ The Vishaal Newsletter, Special Issue No.1, December 1991, https://archive.aeoncentre.com/vishaal/culture-and-cosmos-2-part 3- continued

The Warrior-Child of Ayodhya – 1, The significance of his appearance for the Hindu Samaj, 5 October 2010.
http://puraniccosmologyupdated.blogspot.com/2010/10/warrior-child-of-ayodhya-1.html

The Warrior -Child of Ayodhya – 2, 24 October, 2010
http://puraniccosmologyupdated.blogspot.com/2010/10/significance-of-his-appearance-for.html

The Warrior-Chld of Ayodhya – 3, 24 October, 2010
http://puraniccosmologyupdated.blogspot.com/2010/10/warrior-child-of-ayodhya-3.html

Ramlal and the Makar Sankranti – revisited, 14, December, 2012
http://puraniccosmologyupdated.blogspot.com/2012/12/ramlal-and-makar-sankranti-revisited.html

 

Without a knowledge of India being the soul of the Earth, without a perspective that enables one to identify the roles being played by particular individuals in the unfoldment of our/the Divine Mother’s evolutionary journey, political and intellectual analyses seek to fill the void.

A New Yorker article January 24, 2024 titled ‘How the Hindu Right Triumphed in India’ by Isaac Chotiner summarizes some of those analyses.  He interviews Mukul Kesavan, an essayist and historian who lives in New Delhi.  Mr. Kesavan states, among other things,

“ . . . The B.J.P. and the R.S.S. conceive of India as an explicitly Hindu nation,  despite the fact that the country has a population of more than two hundred million Muslims.”

Regarding this statement one must ask what it actually means for India to be a ‘Hindu’ nation. How could She possibly be THAT and still be a nation of diversity and inclusivity? (See ‘The Burden of Destiny‘, excerpted above). This is not well understood, and is the crux of the situation.  Hindu Dharma is not about proselytizing.  It is not about conquering other peoples and civilizations.  Prior to the attacks it has suffered in the past several centuries, its very nature was one of tolerance and inclusivity (prior to the perversion of the caste system.) [5a] It had no need to impose itself on others. Which is not to say individual Hindus have not engaged in acts of violence and cruelty in an effort to rectify perceived wrongs.    

Since the phrase ‘diversity and inclusivity’ refers in large measure to the 200 million Muslims who also live in India, and not withstanding the lovely sentiment expressed by Hana Hashmi in the Newsweek article cited at the beginning of this blog, it is interesting to read the assessment of R Jagannathan, who writes for Swarajya magazine.

In his January 25th article ‘Hindus Must Rethink Kashi-Mathura Approach before Plunging Headlong Into Conflict’, [5b]  he explores what he sees as the heart of the impasse between Hindus and Muslims. (Kashi and Mathura are cities with Muslim mosques considered by Hindus to be built on the sites of destroyed Hindu temples, as was Ayodhya.) [6]

Excerpts from Jagannathan’s article:

“The real issue is a refusal by mainstream Muslim opinion to even acknowledge that Islamic iconoclasm destroyed many temples. Barring a few notable examples like K K Mohammed, who was part of the Ayodhya excavations, there is no widespread acceptance by the Muslim community that this open sore in Hindu-Muslim relations cannot be healed without an acknowledgement of the truth.

“Clearly, the primary challenge before Hindus, the Bharatiya Janata Party/Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh parivar and the Union government is to engage with many of the leaders of the Muslim community — and not just the clerics — to explain why acknowledgement of the past is important for progress on communal relations.

“They need to be assured that today’s Muslims had nothing to do with temple destructions, but if there is no acknowledgement of the harm done in the past, tensions cannot be eased and everyone will suffer. More importantly, the economic upliftment of Muslims will find no broad support among the majority community.”

“ . . . If the Ram Janmabhoomi issue cannot be decided on the basis of historical evidence even in the courts, how can any Hindu-Muslim tussle over religious sites be settled amicably?”

“…Muslims in India need to introspect on what their endless passive-aggressive victimhood stance is actually doing to their future. Nowhere in the world have Muslims introspected on the past, and never have they acknowledged past oppression of non-Muslims, unlike the Christian church. It would be great if this reform and reconciliation movement begins in India, where over 200 million Muslims live.”

The Hindu/Muslim relationship has complexities that are not the focus of Mr. Jagannathan’s article.  His perspective is interesting, however, and one wonders to what degree his suggestions, if taken up, would help move India toward fulfilment of that ‘pulse of destiny’ described by Thea, and in which ALL Indians partake.  

Footnotes & Further Reading

[1] Pran Pratishtha:  “Pran Pratishtha stands as a profound invocation, summoning the very essence of the divine into an idol. ‘Pran,’ symbolizing life, and ‘pratishtha,’ portraying resolute establishment, intertwine in a dramatic act that breathes life into the deity. The conclusion of the Pran Pratishtha ceremony orchestrates a staggering metamorphosis, transforming the once inert idol into a living embodiment of the divine. This radical transformation empowers the idol with an extraordinary ability—to receive prayers and bestow blessings upon worshippers in their pursuit of divine intervention. The effects of Pran Pratishtha are believed to be enduring, with the divine presence within the idol said to persist for eternity.”  Longview News Journal, January 21, 2024

[2]  Thea has written a voluminous amount regarding India’s destiny.  To start, see https://aeongroup.com/aeon-group-the-burden-of-a-destiny, The Gnostic Circle,  The New Way Vols 1&2,  Time & Imperishability,  Ganga, Soul of India Culture  at http://aeongroup.com/aeon-group-books

[3]  https://news24online.com/india/ram-mandir-pran-pratishtha-to-begin-at-1215-know-the-significance-of-this-auspicious-muhurt/213980

https://www.etvbharat.com/english/state/uttar-pradesh/auspicious-timing-for-ram-mandir-pran-pratisha-decided-find-details-here/na20231224123849545545214

[4]  ‘A Calendar that Unifies’ https://archive.aeoncentre.com/articles/a-calendar-that-unifies
 ‘The Origins and Nature of Hindu Decline’ https://archive.aeoncentre.com/articles and ‘Answer to Freedam Cole’s Tale of Two Zodiacs:   https://archive.aeoncentre.com/articles/contributed

[5a] https://archive.aeoncentre.com/vishaal/culture-and-cosmos-2-part-3-continued

[5b] https://swarajyamag.com/search/Hindus%20Must%20Rethink%20Kashi-Mathura%20Approach%20before%20Plunging%20Headlong%20Into%20Conflict

[6] For more on this, see: https://www.indiatoday.in/interactive/longread/the-troubled-mosques-of-kashi-mathura-170-12-09-2022]